Logo

Can you explain the difference between fissionable and fissile materials and their role in nuclear power reactors?

07.06.2025 19:18

Can you explain the difference between fissionable and fissile materials and their role in nuclear power reactors?

Admitting option 2 totally upends all cosmology and most of your concepts of nuclear energy etc. I worked at the US Army PD-TMDE on Redstone Arsenal. They have a division of guys there known as CALSETS (Calibration team) They got a cute new clock while I was working there that was a whole lot cheaper and a whole lot more accurate than a Cesium Clock. (National Standard is Cesium) This allowed them to do something that they wanted to do. They recalibrated their nuclear energy standard samples.

The atom from it’s creation is intelligent and knows when to decay

Fusion is really no different. None of this crappy Weak Force, Strong Force stuff. If the resonant frequency of 2 atoms is stimulated and they bump together they stick! This is the whole process. Too simple for most people to even imagine it. You can throw out the whole nonsense and it gets simple.

R.I.P Loretta Swit: How well do you remember ''Hot Lips'' Houlihan? - MeTV

What they found shocked them. Nuclear Fission Decay of isotopes like Plutonium varied as much as 23% with the movement of the Moon in front of the Sun! This confirms exactly what I told you in option 2 above. It completely alters all of the concept of Nuclear Fission. It says that there are NO unstable atoms. There are atoms that when acted on by external forces that go unstable. You may take this seriously because this means the whole issue is to affect the external forces and you affect these reactions. It portends being able to turn on and off a nuclear weapon remotely at will! It portends the ability to cause nuclear weapons to go of remotely at will! It also involves how we run nuclear reactors!

Most people do not understand that the concept of the Bohr Atom Model was the product of cosmology study. Similarly the development of the Atomic Bomb was as well. Now rather than go into that deeply I will simply state that the concept has run into a brick wall. Atomic Physics Research has splattered like a high speed race car hitting a brick wall against reality. Cosmology has too. The Webb Space Telescope has absolutely destroyed the very basic cosmology that underlies this “science” which it is not, of nuclear physics. It hit the wall because it’s ideas are wrong.

It is fairly obvious from the Newtonian laws of motion that unless you believe in intelligent atoms the decay of atoms is not a product of their own internal condition. So option 1 doesn’t make sense.

Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination - Marin Independent Journal

There is a whole series here. I would suggest if you are interested you find several hours and get into it!

I am going to explain this in a unique way because it is painfully clear that the whole concept of fission/fusion reactions and nuclear reactions is clearly falling apart in the face of reality.

You are taught that atoms decay in a “half life.” This is the basis of radiological dating and it is the basis of nuclear reactions underlying fission. The only problem with this concept which is fairly well proved as to experienced reality is that it requires to understand it one of two concepts, neither of which anyone is willing to discuss.

Stunning Images Reveal The Sun's Surface in Unprecedented Detail - ScienceAlert

Welcome to “Wonderland Alice”.

What I am telling you is the basis of the Structure Atomic Model (SAM). SAM is proving itself every day. The reality is that our world is quite simpler than people think.

There is an energy field, “Maxwell’s Ether” it exists and it is in the drivers seat. Our system of science stinks like a dead corpse! We are back that quaint concept of research and learning again.

I have a "fat pussy" and I'm super self cautions about it. Do guys think it's gross?

Our nuclear reactors are all 100% Fission reactors. We have no fusion reactors except Atomic Weapons designs. The structure of, design of and operation of nuclear reactors is all centered around actually generation of the light to fracture the nucleus of atoms. This appears to involve Neutrons but as you will see Neutrons do not exist! That was one of the big errors! SAM shows you what they are. It also explains how amazingly simple this works. It is all resonant energy and light here!

This portends being able to cause any atom to undergo Fission or Fusion at will and on command. It also explains how Physics has gone smack splattering into a wall. It’s basic concepts are wrong. It also says our cosmology is wrong. (Webb Telescope tells us this) Our dating systems are wrong. Nearly everything you “know” is wrong!

First things you need to understand is that Nuclear fission was discovered largely as an outgrowth of early chemistry research. I think people don’t understand how recent this research is! The very concept of an orderly chemistry study is about 300 years old and has had many improvements over time. The very concept of Atomic Reactions is also very new. Most of the early work is the product of the late 1880’s to 1940’s. The success of the atomic bombs, sort of cemented the idea that we were right in our theories. Unfortunately this is not so.

ASCO day 2: A tragic paradox, Gilead updates, and lots of Pfizer news - statnews.com

Now rather than confuse you with a ton of nonsense and deep in math which means exactly nothing, I will try to simplify this. Sorry it is hard to do this simplification.

Now here is the basic reality. Fission happens when light (not neutrons or whatever) of a specific frequency strikes the nucleus of an atom. This frequency is unique to that isotope! It is very tightly frequency and direction specific. The orientation of the nucleus and they have shapes is trigonometrically related to the frequency they can receive. Struck by the right amount of energy the atom flies apart in a very predetermined order. Electrically this is a “notch filter” the atom only receives a specific resonant frequency to do this. This is why our atomic clocks run slow in orbit and people think relativity works. You move the clock faster the resonant reception is changed! It’s called Doppler Shift.

I am not being critical of the Bohr Models and such as I was taught these when I was younger. I am very critical of the unwillingness of modern nuclear physics to get it’s head out of its ASS and refusing to see that they need to revamp their thinking.

Nintendo Switch 2 launch: GameStop investigating claims of console damage - NBC News

The atom is caused to decay by some external force.

Now to most people this would be about as boring as watching grass grow. or watching continental drift. I genuinely cannot think of anything most people would find more useless and boring. But you must understand that this is the stuff by which the US Army can do things like aim Artillery Shells or Launch Rockets and such. Accuracy here is painfully important. It can literally be the stuff of the survival of the USA. But to most people it is pretty snoring boring stuff.

Now I do not propose that they technology has gotten to where this goes but what I am telling you is as obvious as when the nuclear physics people learned of fission from Germany in the late 1930’s. The famous Einstein letter that set off the Project Manhattan and development of the Atomic Bomb resulted from this sort of obvious reality.

Is it recommended to leave a note in a lost wallet asking for it to be returned?